People insights

24 June 2015

Mobile-minded: The small screen isn’t so small

Explore how people's brains and physiology respond to adverts served on both a smartphone and a TV.

CONTENTS

    Today, people tune into content whenever and wherever they want. With viewing happening at home on a TV and on the go on a smartphone, marketers want to ensure that their messages are being received no matter the screen. To determine whether their advertising is effective, marketers have traditionally turned to self-reported market research techniques, but those approaches have limitations.

    Facebook commissioned SalesBrain, a US-based neuromarketing agency, to understand how people’s brains and physiology respond to identical stimuli viewed on a smartphone versus on a TV.

    Today, people tune into content whenever and wherever they want. With viewing happening at home on a TV and on the go on a smartphone, marketers want to ensure that their messages are being received no matter the screen. To determine whether their advertising is effective, marketers have traditionally turned to self-reported market research techniques, but those approaches have limitations. Enter neuromarketing, which according to the Neuromarketing Science and Business Association “is the systematic collection and interpretation of neurological and neurophysiological insights about individuals using different protocols allowing researchers to explore non-verbal and unconscious physiological responses to various stimuli for the purposes of market research.” Though still in its infancy as a marketing research practice, neuromarketing is giving marketers a direct view into people’s physical reactions to stimuli rather than relying solely on people’s ability to report their own feelings to that stimuli.

    Facebook commissioned SalesBrain, a US-based neuromarketing agency, to understand how people’s brains and physiology respond to identical stimuli viewed on a smartphone versus on a TV. The study focused on how the brain responds to four key areas: engagement, attention, emotion and retention. We recently spoke with Helen Crossley, Head of Audience Insights for Facebook IQ, Dr Christophe Morin, Founder and CEO of SalesBrain, and Dr Paul Zak, President of ZESTxLabs, to understand the methodology behind the research, the results and what the results means for marketers. Edited excerpts of our conversation follow.

    Neuroscience research study

    Q: What was the reason behind pursuing a neuroscience research study?

    Helen: Facebook IQ recently conducted a significant piece of research to explore how people share – and share in – the moments that matter to them on Facebook and Instagram. What we have seen is that, with the advent of mobile, we’re moving from fewer bigger, longer moments manufactured by the media and marketing industry to a time when people are manufacturing and consuming their own moments en masse, every day, 365 days a year. Given that people are processing so many moments every day, we sought to understand how exactly people are processing those moments – from a physiological and neurological standpoint – and how that processing varies depending on the screen.

    Neuroscience answers marketing questions

    Q: How does neuroscience research help answer marketing questions?

    Dr Morin: By monitoring the direct response of advertising on people's brains, on their nervous systems, we are able to pick up objective measurements that we can trust, and understand and predict the effect of advertising.

    Q: So, how did you approach this research?

    Dr Zak: To our knowledge, this is the first time that a neuroscience study has compared adverts watched on a mobile device to adverts watched on TV.

    Helen: In scoping this study with Dr Zak and Dr Morin, we wanted to design an advert experience that best represented how people view adverts on a smartphone and on a TV. We created a test environment where participants viewed a stimulus while watching a TV show or while scrolling through a Facebook News Feed.

    Dr Zak: Multiple neurological measures were taken to capture the unconscious responses of the 70 volunteer participants. At the ZESTxLabs, we were then able to observe autonomic measures, such as sweat, heart rate and eye movements, as well as brain activity measured via electroencephalogram (EEG) when they viewed a stimulus on either a smartphone or a TV.

    Helen: We also surveyed the participants to understand their message recall of the stimulus on the smartphone and on the TV.

    How were the participants exposed to the stimuli?

    Q: How were the participants exposed to the stimuli?

    Dr Zak: The participants were randomly split into two groups, accounting for age and gender. First the participants completed a baseline measure. Then each group viewed a set of stimulus adverts, which ranged from movie trailers to brand adverts and varied in length from 30-120 seconds. Group one viewed the stimulus on a TV first then a smartphone. Group two completed the same set of exercises as Group one, except those participants began with a smartphone and then viewed the adverts on a TV.

    Experimental design

    TV

    viewing

    Baseline

    measures

    →

    TV

    Show

    →

    Stimuli

    Neurological measurement (Bio, EEG and eye tracking) captured throughout

    Mobile

    viewing

    Baseline

    measures

    →

    Facebook

    News Feed

    →

    Stimuli

    Q: How were you able to analyse participants’ reactions to the stimulus on each screen to determine your results?

    Dr Morin: We have found a way to crunch this data and provide calculations and predictions that tell us how people really process information at the cortical and subcortical levels.

    Dr Zak: The metrics that the physiological and neurological measurement techniques derive, such as change in heart rate or the change in EEG rhythm, are analysed in combination with proprietary analytic algorithms called the Zak Engagement Statistic (ZEST).

    Dr Morin: Through the EEG, we were able to analyse the brainwaves’ frequency, helping us monitor the degree to which people paid attention to the advert, their advert preference and their motivation to approach or withdraw from the stimuli.

    How do people process adverts on a smartphone and on a TV?

    Q: Based on your analysis, what did you discover about how people process adverts on a smartphone and on a TV?

    Helen: Overall, people were more attentive and tended to feel more positively toward the information presented on a mobile phone than on a TV. With TV, people’s brains were more distracted and had to work harder to process the information. We found that overall, mobile was on par with TV with regard to emotional intensity and engagement. Having said that, emotions and engagement were significantly higher for a couple of the adverts. People were equally likely to be as engaged on mobile as they were on TV.

    As an added layer on top of the neuro research, we also saw an uplift in message recall when participants viewed the stimuli on TV followed by viewing it on a smartphone.

    Neurological measures based on viewing stimuli on a smartphone and a TV

    Mobile higher than TV

    TV higher than mobile

    Attention1

    Distraction1

    Intensity of emotions

    Neurological measurement (Bio, EEG and eye tracking) captured throughout

    Approach motivation2

    Cognitive load1

    Engagement

    Q: Were these the results you expected to find?

    Dr Morin: We did not expect that the mobile viewing experience would produce more positive emotions. This was surprising. You would assume that because the TV screen is larger than a smartphone screen, the bigger screen would yield a more positive emotional response.

    It seems that when viewing a stimulus, our neurological systems don’t really require a grandiose experience to feel a response. Overall, the more data that we seem to be exposed to, the more effort is placed on our brain. And, in some way, due to its size, the smartphone may provide a more efficient, less energy-demanding experience.

    Main takeaways from research

    Q: What can we take away from this research overall? Was there a clear difference between the screens?

    Dr Morin: It is our conclusion that the smartphone experience is more immersive than the experience of TV viewing overall. When the same advert stimulus played on a smartphone, the reaction was greater than TV on both attention and positive emotion, and, to some degree, on engagement, which was quite remarkable.

    Helen: We also saw some initial results on the complementary nature of the 2 screens. In analysing the post-exposure survey, there was an uplift in message recall when a participant viewed the same stimulus on a TV first, followed by a smartphone. By creating campaigns with cross-screen appeal, marketers can help to further drive the retention rates of their advertising.

    Q: Final thoughts as marketers think about neuromarketing and the ways it can inform their strategies

    Helen: I feel like we’re at the beginning of being able to help marketers understand what role neuroscience can play in market research. This initial study has revealed that there are more opportunities to research how people’s brains respond and process advertising through the lens of neuromarketing.

    Dr Zak: Advertising is fascinating to study because it’s about stories, and our brains love good stories. It’s good stories that move us to action. I think the beautiful thing about neuroscience applied to marketing is that we don’t have to go on our intuition, what we believe, what we feel. We can test. And the results that you get are real. They’re actionable.

    Mobile strategies for marketers

    Q: How should marketers think about their mobile strategies?

    Helen: Don’t overlook mobile. Our physical closeness to the mobile screen has shifted our perception of the size of the device. It’s drawing us in to be more attentive and feel more positively about the content that is presented on it and creating opportunities for marketers to connect with people.

    Maximise your message. Create campaigns that appeal not only to the right senses but also the right screens. Appeal to people who are mobile-minded by being more efficient in your messaging, putting the key messages points within the first ten seconds and taking advantage of cross-screen opportunities to extend your reach.

    And test your approach. Use a combination of market research techniques to understand the effectiveness of your campaign. By aligning your business objectives and your campaign approach, marketers can evaluate and refine their mobile marketing strategies to best reach the right people.

    Video: Dr Morin and Dr Zak on “Neuro Mobile” (2:49)

    Video: Dr Morin and Dr Zak on “Neuro Mobile” (2:49)

    Play Icon

    Source: “Neuro Mobile” by SalesBrain (study of US adults commissioned by Facebook), May 2015.

    Next in people insights



    Stay in the know

    Get timely insights from Facebook IQ delivered to your inbox.